IS CHEST X-RAY USEFUL IN EARLY DETECTION OF LUNG CANCER? : THE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Keywords:
Chest X-Ray, Lung Cancer, Detection, Systematic ReviewAbstract
Introduction: In spite of expanding utilize of computed tomography (CT), chest X-ray remains the firstline examination for suspected lung cancer in essential care in Indonesia. This paper point to assess the affectability of chest X-ray for recognizing lung cancer in symptomatic individuals.
Method: This study using systematic review that search using keyword Chest X-Ray and Lung Cancer in Google Scholar, PubMed, and CrossRef. After final screening the author analysize 4 articles.
Result: chest X-ray falls flat to recognize lung cancer (at slightest at first) in >20% of individuals who are hence analyzed with lung cancer. All three of these considers were conducted in nations with broadly comparative essential care frameworks (Denmark, Britain, Republic of Ireland). Two of these considers were determined from essential care settings and, in spite of the fact that the remaining think about was from an auxiliary care radiology office, it is likely that numerous of the chest X-rays performed come about from essential care referrals.
Conclusion: In spite of the fact that there's a lack of prove, the highest-quality ponders propose that the affectability of chest X-ray for symptomatic lung cancer is as it were 77% to 80%. GPs ought to consider in case encourage examination is essential in high-risk patients who have had a negative chest X-ray.
References
Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, et al. (2015) Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 136(5):E359–E386.
Cancer Research UK (2019) Lung cancer statistics. https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancerstatistics/statistics-by-cancer-type/lung-cancer (accessed 19 April 2022).
Cancer Research UK (2014) Breast cancer survival statistics. https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/healthprofessional/cancer-statistics/statistics-by-cancer-type/breast-cancer/survival#heading-Two (accessed 19 April 2022).
Rubin G, Berendsen A, Crawford SM, et al.(2015) The expanding role of primary care in cancer control. Lancet Oncol 16(12):1231–1272.
Hamilton W (2010) Br J Gen Pract, Cancer diagnosis in primary care. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp10X483175.
Public Health England. (2008) Patient dose information: guidance; X-ray examinations. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/medical-radiation-patient-doses/patient-doseinformation-guidance (accessed 19 April 2022)
Aslam R, Kennedy MP, Bhartia B, et al. (2018) The radiological route to diagnosis of lung cancer patients. Thorax 73(Suppl 4):A70–A71.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2011) Lung cancer: diagnosis and management CG121 (NICE, London) https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg121/chapter/1-Guidance (accessed 19 April 2022).Google Scholar
Arnold M, Rutherford MJ, Bardot A, et al. Progress in cancer survival, mortality, and incidence in seven highincome countries 1995–2014 (ICBP SURVMARK-2): a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 2019; https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470- 2045(19)30456-5.
Eurostat, Statistics Explained. Healthcare resource statistics-technical resources and medical technology. 2019; https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/ statistics-explained/index.php/Healthcare_resource_statistics_-_technical_ resources_and_medical_technology#Availability_of_technical_resources_in_ hospitals. (accessed Apr 2022).
Bjerager M, Palshof T, Dahl R, et al. Delay in diagnosis of lung cancer in general practice. Br J Gen Pract 2006; 56(532): 863–868.
Brock MV, Hooker CM, Engels EA, et al. Delayed diagnosis and elevated mortality in an urban population with HIV and lung cancer: implications for patient care. J Acquir Immume Defic Syndr 2006; 43(1): 47–55.
Stapley S, Sharp D, Hamilton W. Negative chest X-rays in primary care patients with lung cancer. Br J Gen Pract 2006; 56(529): 570–573.
Fernandez V, Alonso JL, Munuera L, et al. Analysis of lung cancer cases diagnosed in an internal medicine department: from January 2001 to September 2006. (In Spanish). An Sist Sanit Navar 2007; 30(3): 353–362.
Kato T, Narita K, Ohara K. Three cases of squamous cell carcinomas which enlarged rapidly with necrotic cavities after bronchoscopy. (In Japanese). Japanese Journal of Lung Cancer 2010; 50(6): 822–827.
Kikuchi R, Isowa N, Tokuyasu H, et al. Three cases of resected pleomorphic carcinoma. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010; 16(4): 264–269.
Uzun O, Atasoy Y, Findik S, et al. A prospective evaluation of hemoptysis cases in a tertiary referral hospital. Clin Resp J 2010; 4(3): 131–138.
Mao JF, Zhang JL, Nie M, et al. Diabetes insipidus as the first symptom caused by lung cancer metastasis to the pituitary glands: clinical presentations, diagnosis, and management. J Postgrad Med 2011; 57(4): 302–306.
Okazaki A, Araya T, Sakai A, et al. Two cases of small cell lung cancer with metastasis to the stomach at initial diagnosis. (In Japanese). Japanese Journal of Lung Cancer 2012; 52(2): 220–225.
Barry C, Bergin D. Non-detected primary lung cancers on chest x-ray: 3 year retrospective review in university hospital. Ir J Med Sci 2015; 1: S262.
Ghimire RH, Bhatta N, Koirala P, et al. Outcomes bronchoscopic evaluation in a university hospital. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc 2016; 55(204): 51–54.
Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ 2015; 351: h5527.
Bentley TG, Catanzaro A, Ganiats TG. Implications of the impact of prevalence on test thresholds and outcomes: lessons from tuberculosis. BMC Res Notes 2012; 5(1): 563.
Quekel LGBA, Kessels AGH, Goei R, van Engelshoven JMA. Miss rate of lung cancer on the chest radiograph in clinical practice. Chest 1999; 115(3): 720– 724
Kvale PA, Johnson CC, Tammemägi M, et al. Interval lung cancers not detected on screening chest X-rays: how are they different? Lung Cancer 2014; 86(1): 41–46.
Del Ciello A, Franchi P, Contegiacomo A, et al. Missed lung cancer: when, where, and why? Diag Interv Radiol 2017; 23(2): 118–126.
Kundel HL, La Follette PS Jr. Visual search patterns and experience with radiological images. Radiology 1972; 103(3): 523–528.
Austin JH, Romney BM, Goldsmith LS. Missed bronchogenic carcinoma: radiographic findings in 27 patients with a potentially resectable lesion evident in retrospect. Radiology 1992; 182(1): 115–122.
Shah PK, Austin JHM, White CS, et al. Missed non-small cell lung cancer: radiographic findings of potentially resectable lesions evident only in retrospect. Radiology 2003; 226(1): 235–241.
Wu MH, Gotway MB, Lee TJ, et al. Features of non-small cell lung carcinomas overlooked at digital chest radiography. Clin Radiology 2008; 63(5): 518–528.
Theros EG. 1976 Caldwell Lecture: varying manifestation of peripheral pulmonary neoplasms: a radiologicpathologic correlative study. AJR Am J Roentgen 1977; 128(6): 893–914.
Brogdon B, Kelsey C, Moseley RD Jr. Factors affecting perception of pulmonary lesions. Radiol Clin North Am 1983; 21(4): 633–654.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Suspected cancer: recognition and referral. NG12. London: NICE, 2015. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng12 (accessed 19 April 2022).
Kennedy MPT, Cheyne L, Darby M, et al. Lung cancer stage-shift following a symptom awareness campaign. Thorax 2018; 73(12): 1128–1136.
Heleno B, Siersma V, Brodersen J. Estimation of overdiagnosis of lung cancer in low-dose computed tomography screening: a secondary analysis of the Danish lung cancer screening trial. JAMA Intern Med 2018; 178(10): 1420– 1422
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licensing
Ninety Nine Publication publishes articles under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This licensing allows for any use of the work, provided the original author(s) and source are credited, thereby facilitating the free exchange and use of research for the advancement of knowledge.
Detailed Licensing Terms
Attribution (BY): Users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. Users may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses them or their use.
No Additional Restrictions: Users may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.