THE ANALYSIS STUDY OF MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOMES OF CORNEAL DISEASE: A COMPREHENSIVE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/g3bvk356Keywords:
Corneal disease, management, outcomesAbstract
Background: A group of conditions affecting the cornea are referred to as corneal disease. These diseases affect over 10 million people worldwide and are caused by various clinical diseases, such as traumatic injuries, chemical burns, infections, and iatrogenic reasons. Causes include bacterial keratitis, fungal keratitis, Herpes Simplex Keratitis (HSK), trachoma, dry eye disease, keratoconus, ophthalmia neonatorum, and non-infectious neonatorum. The causes of corneal disease affect how they are managed. The outcomes of these interventions vary.
The aim: This study aims to determine the management and outcomes of corneal disease.
Methods: By comparing itself to the standards set by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and MetaAnalysis (PRISMA) 2020, this study was able to show that it met all of the requirements. So, the experts were able to make sure that the study was as up-to-date as it was possible to be. For this search approach, publications that came out between 2014 and 2024 were taken into account. Several different online reference sources, like Pubmed, SAGEPUB, and ScienceDirect, were used to do this. It was decided not to take into account review pieces, works that had already been published, or works that were only half done.
Results: In the PubMed database, the results of our search brought up 1358 articles, whereas the results of our search on SAGEPUB brought up 1823 articles, and our search on ScienceDirect brought up 6091 articles. In the end, we compiled 6 papers, 3 of which came from PubMed, 2 of which came from ScienceDirect, and 1 of which came from SagePub. We included six research that met the criteria.
Conclusion: In conclusion, surgical management shows good outcomes in controlling the corneal diseases. It can also maintain structural integrity of cornea and contribute to lowering blindness worldwide.
References
Rowsey TG, Karamichos D. The role of lipids in corneal diseases and dystrophies: a systematic review. Clin Transl Med; 6. Epub ahead of print December 2017. DOI: 10.1186/s40169-017-0158-1.
Mansoor H, Ong HS, Riau AK, et al. Current trends and future perspective of mesenchymal stem cells and exosomes in corneal diseases. International Journal of Molecular Sciences; 20. Epub ahead of print June 2, 2019. DOI: 10.3390/ijms20122853.
Wu D, Lim DKA, Lim BXH, et al. Corneal Cross-Linking: The Evolution of Treatment for Corneal Diseases. Frontiers in Pharmacology; 12. Epub ahead of print July 19, 2021. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.686630.
Flaxman SR, Bourne RRA, Resnikoff S, et al. Global causes of blindness and distance vision impairment 1990–2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2017; 5: e1221– e1234.
Coco G, Romano V. Corneal Disease & Transplantation. Journal of Clinical Medicine; 11. Epub ahead of print August 1, 2022. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11154432.
Tidke SC, Tidake P. A Review of Corneal Blindness: Causes and Management. Cureus. Epub ahead of print October 9, 2022. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.30097.
Tahvildari M, Singh RB, Saeed HN. Application of Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis and Management of Corneal Diseases. Seminars in Ophthalmology 2021; 36: 641–648.
Bouhout S, Robert MC, Deli S, et al. Corneal Melt after Boston Keratoprosthesis: Clinical Presentation, Management, Outcomes and Risk Factor Analysis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 2018; 26: 693–699.
Ferrini E, Aleo D, Posarelli C, et al. Impact of corneal collagen cross-linking on vision-related quality of life measured with the keratoconus outcomes research questionnaire (KORQ) in patients with keratoconus. Contact Lens and Anterior Eye; 46. Epub ahead of print April 1, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.clae.2022.101746.
Li M, Yu T, Gao X, et al. Accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking in clinical management of infectious keratitis. Journal of International Medical Research; 48. Epub ahead of print June 1, 2020. DOI: 10.1177/0300060520926411.
Qiao GL, Ling J, Wong T, et al. Candida Keratitis: Epidemiology, Management, and Clinical Outcomes, www.corneajrnl.com (2020).
Singhal D, Sahay P, Maharana PK, et al. Clinical presentation and management of corneal fistula. British Journal of Ophthalmology 2019; 103: 530–533.
Trinh T, Santaella G, Mimouni M, et al. Assessment of response to multimodal management of neurotrophic corneal disease. Ocular Surface 2021; 19: 330–335.
Urbańska K, Woźniak M, Więsyk P, et al. Management and Treatment Outcomes of High-Risk Corneal Transplantations. J Clin Med; 11. Epub ahead of print October 1, 2022. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11195511.
Porth JM, Deiotte E, Dunn M, et al. A Review of the Literature on the Global Epidemiology of Corneal Blindness, www.corneajrnl.com (2019).
Saldanha IJ, Lindsley KB, Lum F, et al. Reliability of the Evidence Addressing Treatment of Corneal Diseases: A Summary of Systematic Reviews. JAMA Ophthalmol 2019; 137: 775–785.
Cordeiro JV, Alanis MM, Mexico A, et al. Big data in corneal diseases and cataract: Current applications and future directions, https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/.
Tuli S, Gray M. Surgical management of corneal infections. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology 2016; 27: 340–347.
Murueta-Goyena A, Cañadas P. Resultados visuales y manejo tras cirugía refractiva corneal: revisión. Journal of Optometry 2018; 11: 121–129.
Scruggs BA, Quist TS, Zimmerman MB, et al. Risk factors, management, and outcomes of
Acanthamoeba keratitis: A retrospective analysis of 110 cases. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep; 25. Epub ahead of print March 1, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajoc.2022.101372.
Piñero-Llorens DP, Murueta-Goyena Larrañaga A, Hanneken L. Visual outcomes and complications of small-incision lenticule extraction: A review. Expert Review of Ophthalmology 2016; 11: 59–75.
Tomás-Juan J, Murueta-Goyena Larrañaga A, Hanneken L. Corneal regeneration after photorefractive keratectomy: A review. Journal of Optometry 2015; 8: 149–169.
Arnalich-Montiel F, Alió del Barrio JL, Alió JL. Corneal surgery in keratoconus: which type, which technique, which outcomes? Eye and Vision; 3. Epub ahead of print December 1, 2016. DOI:
1186/s40662-016-0033-y.
Choi JA, Lee MA, Kim MS. Long-term outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty in keratoconus: Analysis of the factors associated with final visual acuities. Int J Ophthalmol 2014; 7: 517–521.
Mandathara PS, Stapleton FJ, Willcox MDP. Outcome of keratoconus management: Review of the Past 20 Years’ contemporary treatment modalities. Eye and Contact Lens 2017; 43: 141–154.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licensing
Ninety Nine Publication publishes articles under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This licensing allows for any use of the work, provided the original author(s) and source are credited, thereby facilitating the free exchange and use of research for the advancement of knowledge.
Detailed Licensing Terms
Attribution (BY): Users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. Users may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses them or their use.
No Additional Restrictions: Users may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
