THE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF OUTCOME AFTER RECONSTRUCTION OF THE PROXIMAL HUMERUS FOR TUMOR RESECTION

Authors

  • Ricky Ferdiansyah Faculty of Medicine, Sultan Agung Islamic University, Indonesia Author
  • Alvin Pratama Santosa Hospital Bandung Kopo, Indonesia Author
  • Yosie Yulanda Putra H. Bakri Sungai Penuh General Hospital, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/dnknhn92

Keywords:

Reconstruction, surgery, proximal humerus, tumor resection, outcome

Abstract

Background: Orthopaedic oncologists often encounter malignant tumors of the proximal humerus, which are the third most common location for bone and soft tissue tumors. These tumors present more therapeutic difficulties in terms of local control and future repair than those in other locations. Each surgical techniques have advantages and disadvantages. It has different outcomes.

The aim: This study aims to show the outcomes after reconstruction of the proximal humerus for tumor resection.

Methods: By comparing itself to the standards set by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and MetaAnalysis (PRISMA) 2020, this study was able to show that it met all of the requirements. So, the experts were able to make sure that the study was as up-to-date as it was possible to be. For this search approach, publications that came out between 2014 and 2024 were taken into account. Several different online reference sources, like PubMed and ScienceDirect, were used to do this. It was decided not to take into account review pieces, works that had already been published, or works that were only half done.

Results: In the PubMed database, the results of our search brought up 125 articles, whereas the results of our search on ScienceDirect brought up 141 articles. The results of the search conducted by title screening yielded a total 26 articles for PubMed and 32 articles for ScienceDirect. We compiled a total of 29 papers, 12 of which came from PubMed and 17 of which came from ScienceDirect. We excluded 2 review articles, 9 duplicate articles, 1 non-full text article, and 2 articles having ineligible outcomes data. In the end, we included fifteen research that met the criteria.

Conclusion: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty showed potential for best functional outcomes and no local recurrence occurred during follow-up period. Whereas endoprostheses and allograft-prosthesis showed lowest complications rates. However, further investigation is needed.

References

Grosel TW, Plummer DR, Mayerson JL, Scharschmidt TJ, Barlow JD. Oncologic reconstruction of the proximal humerus with a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty megaprosthesis. J Surg Oncol. 2018 Nov 1;118(6):867–72.

Lozano-Calderón SA, Chen N. Proximal humerus allograft prosthetic composites: technique, outcomes, and pearls and pitfalls. Vol. 8, Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine. Humana Press Inc.; 2015. p. 324–33.

Sirveaux F. Reconstruction techniques after proximal humerus tumour resection. Vol. 105, Orthopaedics and Traumatology: Surgery and Research. Elsevier Masson SAS; 2019. p. S153–64.

D’Arienzo A, Ipponi E, Ruinato AD, De Franco S, Colangeli S, Andreani L, et al. Proximal Humerus Reconstruction after Tumor Resection: An Overview of Surgical Management. Adv Orthop. 2021;2021.

Ibrahim M, Shah SA, Ahmed I, Khan MA, Khan Z. Is there an ideal method of reconstruction for proximal humerus osteosarcoma? A review of different reconstruction techniques. Vol. 73, Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association. Pakistan Medical Association; 2023. p. 1069–75.

Rajasekaran RB, Ashford R, Stevenson JD, Pollock R, Rankin KS, Patton JT, et al. Reconstruction after resection of a proximal humeral tumour. Vol. 104 B, Bone and Joint Journal. British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery; 2022. p. 3–5.

Antal I, Szőke G, Szendrői M, Szalay K, Perlaky T, Kiss J, et al. Functional outcome and quality of life following resection of the proximal humerus performed for musculoskeletal tumors and reconstruction done by four different methods. Musculoskelet Surg. 2023 Sep 1;107(3):351–9.

Bonnevialle N, Mansat P, Lebon J, Laffosse JM, Bonnevialle P. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for malignant tumors of proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015;24(1):36–44.

Gulia A, Raj B K A, Gupta S, Patil A, Puri A. Implant cement spacer-a cost-effective solution for reconstruction of proximal humerus defects after tumor resection. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021 Nov 1;22.

Guven MF, Aslan L, Botanlioglu H, Kaynak G, Kesmezacar H, Babacan M. Functional outcome of reverse shoulder tumor prosthesis in the treatment of proximal humerus tumors. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Jan 1;25(1):e1–6.

Hu H, Liu W, Zeng Q, Wang S, Zhang Z, Liu J, et al. The personalized shoulder reconstruction assisted by 3D printing technology after resection of the proximal humerus tumours. Cancer Manag Res. 2019;11:10665–73.

Jamshidi K, Najd-Mazhar F, Abolghasemzadeh Ahangar F, mirzaei A. The effect of cement augmentation and anteromedial plating on proximal humerus allograft reconstruction. Journal of Orthopaedic Science. 2017 Jan 1;22(1):69–74.

Kapoor L, Banjara R, Ragase A, Majeed A, Kumar VS, Khan SA. Outcomes of major musculoskeletal oncological reconstructions using prolene mesh-a retrospective analysis from a tertiary referral centre. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021 May 1;16:195–201.

Liang H, Guo W, Yang Y, Li D, Yang R, Tang X, et al. Efficacy and safety of a 3D-printed arthrodesis prosthesis for reconstruction after resection of the proximal humerus: preliminary outcomes with a minimum 2-year follow-up. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Dec 1;23(1).

Liu Tang, Zhang Q, Guo X, Zhang X, Li Z, Li X. Treatment and outcome of malignant bone tumors of the proximal humerus: biological versus endoprosthetic reconstruction. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15(69).

El Motassime A, Meschini C, Di Costa D, Rovere G, Matrangolo MR, De Maio F, et al. Functional Outcomes and Shoulder Instability in Reconstruction of Proximal Humerus Metastases. Current Oncology. 2023 Apr 1;30(4):3571–9.

Nota S, Teunis T, Kortlever J, Ferrone M, Ready J, Gebhardt M, et al. Functional Outcomes and Complications after Oncologic Reconstruction of the Proximal Humerus. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2018 Jun 1;26(11):403–9.

Ogink PT, Teunissen FR, Massier JR, Raskin KA, Schwab JH, Lozano-Calderon SA. Allograft reconstruction of the humerus: Complications and revision surgery. J Surg Oncol. 2019 Mar 1;119(3):329–35.

Rafalla AA, Abdullah ESA. Endoprosthetic replacement versus cement spacer in reconstruction of proximal humerus after tumor resection: Cost and benefits. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery. 2017 May 1;25(2).

Vonck CE, Kang HP, Bell JA, Gettleman BS, Sebastian R, Trasolini N, et al. Functional outcomes of oncologic reverse total shoulder arthroplasty after tumor resection. Seminars in Arthroplasty JSES. 2023 Jun 1;33(2):321–30.

Wang B, Wu Q, Liu J, Yang S, Shao Z. Endoprosthetic reconstruction of the proximal humerus after tumour resection with polypropylene mesh. Int Orthop. 2015 Feb 27;39(3):501–6.

Rachbauer AM, Schneider KN, Gosheger G, Deventer N. Endoprosthetic Reconstruction of the Proximal Humerus with an Inverse Tumor Prosthesis. Cancers (Basel). 2023 Nov 8;15(22):5330.

Ebeid WA, Eldaw S, Badr IT, Mesregah MK, Hasan BZ. Outcomes of modular endoprosthesis reconstruction versus cement spacer reconstruction following resection of proximal humeral tumors. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Dec 1;23(1).

Uehara K, Ogura K, Akiyama T, Shinoda Y, Iwata S, Kobayashi E, et al. Reliability and Validity of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Scoring System for the Upper Extremity in Japanese Patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Sep 1;475(9):2253–9.

Lazerges C, Dagneaux L, Degeorge B, Tardy N, Coulet B, Chammas M. Composite reverse shoulder arthroplasty can provide good function and quality of life in cases of malignant tumour of the proximal humerus. Int Orthop. 2017 Dec 1;41(12):2619–25.

Teunis T, Nota SPFT, Hornicek FJ, Schwab JH, Lozano-Calderón SA. Outcome after reconstruction of the proximal humerus for tumor resection: A systematic review. Vol. 472, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. Springer New York LLC; 2014. p. 2245–53.

Pinnamaneni S, Damron TA. Proximal humerus reconstruction in orthopedic oncology. Vol. 7, Journal of Cancer Metastasis and Treatment. OAE Publishing Inc.; 2021.

Van De Sande MAJ, Sander Dijkstra PD, Taminiau AHM. Proximal humerus reconstruction after tumour resection: Biological versus endoprosthetic reconstruction. Int Orthop. 2011 Sep;35(9):1375–80.

Wang Z, Guo Z, Li J, Li X dong, Sang H xun. Functional outcomes and complications of reconstruction of the proximal humerus after intra-articular tumor resection. Orthop Surg. 2010;2(1):19–26.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-08

How to Cite

Ferdiansyah, R., Pratama, A., & Putra, Y. Y. (2024). THE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF OUTCOME AFTER RECONSTRUCTION OF THE PROXIMAL HUMERUS FOR TUMOR RESECTION. Journal of Advanced Research in Medical and Health Science (ISSN 2208-2425), 10(1), 17-27. https://doi.org/10.61841/dnknhn92

Similar Articles

51-60 of 161

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>