EFFICIACY OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY ON HALLUX VALGUS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Keywords:
Anatomy, Hallux valgus, Minimally invasive surgery, RadiologicalAbstract
Introduction: The terms "Hallux valgus" or "hallux abducto-valgus" are the medical terms most commonly used in relation to a bunion anomaly. These deformities can result from foot or joint abnormalities, but the most common cause is wearing too-small or too-large shoes. High heels cause the body to bend forward, which puts pressure on the toes. The type of surgery depends on the bones involved, their angular connection, the joint injury, and other deformities.
The aim: This article describe about efficiacy of minimally invasive surgery on hallux valgus.
Methods: By comparing itself to the standards set by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and MetaAnalysis (PRISMA) 2020, this study was able to show that it met all of the requirements. So, the experts were able to make sure that the study was as up-to-date as it was possible to be. For this search approach, publications that came out between 2013 and 2023 were taken into account. Several different online reference sources, like Pubmed and SagePub, were used to do this. It was decided not to take into account review pieces, works that had already been published, or works that were only half done.
Result: In the PubMed database, the results of our search brought up 89 articles, whereas the results of our search on SagePub brought up 62 articles. The results of the search conducted for the last year of 2013 yielded a total 33 articles for PubMed and 17 articles for SagePub. In the end, we compiled a total of 19 papers, 12 of which came from PubMed and seven of which came from SagePub. We included seven research that met the criteria.
Conclusion: MIS measures for HV surgery can be considered effective with a reoperation rate of less than 20%. Both the radiological and clinical outcome of the minimally invasive osteotomy and the open method are on par with one another.
References
Hecht PJ, Lin TJ. Hallux valgus. Med Clin. 2014;98(2):227–32.
Chell J, Dhar S. Pediatric hallux valgus. Foot Ankle Clin. 2014;19(2):235–43.
Koller U, Willegger M, Windhager R, Wanivenhaus A, Trnka H, Schuh R. Plantar pressure characteristics in hallux valgus feet. J Orthop Res. 2014;32(12):1688–93.
Lee KT, Park YU, Jegal H, Lee TH. Deceptions in hallux valgus: what to look for to limit failures. Foot Ankle Clin. 2014;19(3):361–70.
Fraissler L, Konrads C, Hoberg M, Rudert M, Walcher M. Treatment of hallux valgus deformity. EFORT open Rev. 2016;1(8):295–302.
Shibuya N, Kyprios EM, Panchani PN, Martin LR, Thorud JC, Jupiter DC. Factors associated with early loss of hallux valgus correction. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2018;57(2):236–40.
Raikin SM, Miller AG, Daniel J. Recurrence of hallux valgus: a review. Foot Ankle Clin. 2014;19(2):259–74.
Dragosloveanu S, Popov VM, Cotor D-C, Dragosloveanu C, Stoica CI. Percutaneous Chevron Osteotomy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Mar;58(3).
Torrent J, Baduell A, Vega J, Malagelada F, Luna R, Rabat E. Open vs Minimally Invasive Scarf Osteotomy for Hallux Valgus Correction: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Foot ankle Int. 2021 Aug;42(8):982–93.
Kaufmann G, Dammerer D, Heyenbrock F, Braito M, Moertlbauer L, Liebensteiner M. Minimally invasive versus open chevron osteotomy for hallux valgus correction: a randomized controlled trial. Int Orthop. 2019 Feb;43(2):343–50.
Jowett CRJ, Bedi HS. Preliminary Results and Learning Curve of the Minimally Invasive Chevron Akin Operation for Hallux Valgus. J foot ankle Surg Off Publ Am Coll Foot Ankle Surg. 2017;56(3):445–52.
Mahadevan D, Lines S, Hepple S, Winson I, Harries W. Extended plantar limb (modified) chevron osteotomy versus scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus correction: a randomised controlled trial. Foot Ankle Surg. 2016;22(2):109–13.
Brogan K, Lindisfarne E, Akehurst H, Farook U, Shrier W, Palmer S. Minimally Invasive and Open Distal Chevron Osteotomy for Mild to Moderate Hallux Valgus. Foot ankle Int. 2016 Nov;37(11):1197–204.
Giannini S, Faldini C, Nanni M, Di Martino A, Luciani D, Vannini F. A minimally invasive technique for surgical treatment of hallux valgus: simple, effective, rapid, inexpensive (SERI). Int Orthop. 2013 Sep;37(9):1805–13.
Maffulli N, Longo UG, Marinozzi A, Denaro V. Hallux valgus: effectiveness and safety of minimally invasive surgery. A systematic review. Br Med Bull. 2011;97:149–67.
Faour-Martín O, Martín-Ferrero MA, Valverde García JA, Vega-Castrillo A, de la Red-Gallego MA. Long-term results of the retrocapital metatarsal percutaneous osteotomy for hallux valgus. Int Orthop. 2013 Sep;37(9):1799– 803.
Trnka H-J, Krenn S, Schuh R. Minimally invasive hallux valgus surgery: a critical review of the evidence. Int Orthop. 2013 Sep;37(9):1731–5.
Iyer S, Demetracopoulos CA, Sofka CM, Ellis SJ. High Rate of Recurrence Following Proximal Medial Opening Wedge Osteotomy for Correction of Moderate Hallux Valgus. Foot ankle Int. 2015 Jul;36(7):756–63.
Agrawal Y, Desai A, Mehta J. Lateral sesamoid position in hallux valgus: correlation with the conventional radiological assessment. Foot ankle Surg. 2011;17(4):308–11.
Rodríguez-Reyes G, López-Gavito E, Pérez-Sanpablo AI, Duque-Gastelum CG, Álvarez-Camacho M, MendozaCruz F, et al. Dynamic plantar pressure distribution after percutaneous hallux valgus correction using the ReverdinIsham osteotomy. Rev Investig Clínica. 2014;66(S1):79–84.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licensing
Ninety Nine Publication publishes articles under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This licensing allows for any use of the work, provided the original author(s) and source are credited, thereby facilitating the free exchange and use of research for the advancement of knowledge.
Detailed Licensing Terms
Attribution (BY): Users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. Users may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses them or their use.
No Additional Restrictions: Users may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
