SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF USE OF PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME IN INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/d71bg957Keywords:
Interventional radiology, Patient reported outcome, Quality of LifeAbstract
Introduction: At present, the implementation of patient-reported outcomes in interventional radiology is not widespread. However, they are capable of significantly impacting the manner in which we deliver healthcare. Patient-reported outcomes provide an avenue for evaluating the perceived advantages that patients encounter subsequent to a medical procedure. Furthermore, they facilitate a comparison of these results with those of open procedures that are more invasive, as perceived by the patient.
The aim: This study review of use of patient reported outcome in interventional radiology.
Methods: For this systematic review, publications that were published from 2012 to 2023 were taken into account during the search process. This was achieved through the utilization of numerous online reference sources, such as Pubmed and SagePub. The decision was made to exclude review articles, previously published works, and incomplete works.
Result: We obtained 94 articles from Pubmed and 110 from SagePub. The therapies we extracted were 1 article from Pubmed and 3 articles from SagePub.
Conclusion: Quality of life and patient perception must be respected as one of the parameters of successful therapy. Previous research shows that PRO can be used with good validity and reliability as a therapeutic outcome parameter in many cases, including interventional radiology.
References
Arnold MJ, Keung JJ, McCarragher B. Interventional radiology: indications and best practices. Am Fam Physician. 2019;99(9):547–56.
Vogl TJ, Reith W, Rummeny EJ. Diagnostic and interventional radiology. Springer; 2016.
Brock KK, Chen SR, Sheth RA, Siewerdsen JH. Imaging in Interventional Radiology: 2043 and Beyond. Radiology. 2023;308(1):e230146.
Weiss CR, Hafezi-Nejad N. Interventional Radiology: Past, Present, and Future. Vol. 308, Radiology. Radiological Society of North America; 2023. hal. e230809.
Irvine I, Hayden R, Greene L, Ryan AG. An Update on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Interventional Radiology: The Future Measure of Our Success. Vol. 46, Cardiovascular and interventional radiology. United States; 2023. hal. 1657–61.
Weldring T, Smith SMS. Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). Heal Serv insights. 2013;6:61–8.
gov USD of H and HSFDAC for DE and R laurie. burke@ fda. hhs., gov USD of H and HSFDAC for BE and R toni. stifano@ fda. hhs., gov USD of H and HSFDAC for D and RHS cdrh. fda. Guidance for industry: patientreported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006;4(1):79.
Black N. Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare. Bmj. 2013;346.
Weldring T, Smith SMS. Article commentary: patient-reported outcomes (pros) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Heal Serv insights. 2013;6:HSI-S11093.
Ring NY, England RW, Motaghi M, Garg T, Gong AJ, Gullotti DM, et al. Responsiveness of the PatientReported Outcome Measure for Vascular Malformation Questionnaire in Patients with Low-Flow Vascular Malformations. J Vasc Interv Radiol [Internet]. 1 Mei 2023;34(5):840-848.e5. Tersedia pada: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2023.01.036
England RW, Motaghi M, Kohler B, Hemmingson TE, Wu AW, Weiss CR. Development and Preliminary Validation of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Vascular Malformation Questionnaire: A Prospective Cohort Study. J Vasc Interv Radiol. Mei 2021;32(5):683-690.e4.
Horbach SER, Van De Ven JS, Nieuwkerk PT, Spuls PI, Van Der Horst C, Reekers JA. Patient-reported outcomes of bleomycin sclerotherapy for low-flow vascular malformations and predictors of improvement. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2018;41:1494–504.
Treat-Jacobson D, Lindquist RA, Witt DR, Kirk LN, Schorr EN, Bronas UG, et al. The PADQOL: development and validation of a PAD-specific quality of life questionnaire. Vasc Med. 2012;17(6):405–15.
Karimi M, Brazier J. Health, health-related quality of life, and quality of life: what is the difference? Pharmacoeconomics. 2016;34:645–9.
Toro A, Pulvirenti E, Palermo F, Di Carlo I. Health-related quality of life in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatic resection, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, radiofrequency ablation or no treatment. Surg Oncol. Maret 2012;21(1):e23-30.
Graziani F, Tsakos G. Patient‐based outcomes and quality of life. Periodontol 2000. 2020;83(1):277–94.
Mays RJ, Casserly IP, Kohrt WM, Ho PM, Hiatt WR, Nehler MR, et al. Assessment of functional status and quality of life in claudication. J Vasc Surg. Mei 2011;53(5):1410–21.
Devlin NJ, Brooks R. EQ-5D and the EuroQol Group: Past, Present and Future. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. April 2017;15(2):127–37.
Nordenfelt LY. Concepts and measurement of quality of life in health care. Vol. 47. Springer Science & Business Media; 2013.
Kwan SW, Charalel RA, Stover AM, Baumhauer JF, Cella D, Darien G, et al. Development of National Research and Clinical Agendas for Patient-Reported Outcomes in IR: Proceedings from a Multidisciplinary Consensus Panel. J Vasc Interv Radiol [Internet]. 1 Januari 2018;29(1):1–8. Tersedia pada: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2017.08.027
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licensing
Ninety Nine Publication publishes articles under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This licensing allows for any use of the work, provided the original author(s) and source are credited, thereby facilitating the free exchange and use of research for the advancement of knowledge.
Detailed Licensing Terms
Attribution (BY): Users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. Users may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses them or their use.
No Additional Restrictions: Users may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
