THE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE COMPLICATIONS AND OUTCOMES OF POST PEDIATRIC CRANIOPLASTY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/gn2zc152Keywords:
Pediatric cranioplasty, outcome, complicatioAbstract
Background: Difficulties from cranioplasty are normal in pediatric patients. Be that as it may, insights on cranioplasty procedures, intricacies, and long haul impacts are not surely known. This study does an extensive writing survey to give an outline of current cranioplasty rehearses in youngsters.
Methods: By comparing itself to the standards set by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and MetaAnalysis (PRISMA) 2020, this study was able to show that it met all of the requirements. So, the experts were able to make sure that the study was as up-to-date as it was possible to be. For this search approach, publications that came out between 2014 and 2024 were taken into account. Several different online reference sources, like Pubmed and SCIENCE DIRECT, were used to do this. It was decided not to take into account review pieces, works that had already been published, or works that were only half done.
Result: In the PubMed database, the results of our search brought up 100 articles, whereas the results of our search on SCIENCE DIRECT brought up 417 articles. The results of the search conducted for the last year of 2014 yielded a total 17 articles for PubMed and 7 articles for SCIENCE DIRECT. In the end, we compiled a total of 5 papers, 3 of which came from PubMed and 2 of which came from SCIENCE DIRECT. We included five research that met the criteria.
Conclusion: In summary, the complications for carnioplasty are quite common. Furthermore, the present research lacks well-documented and comparable outcome factors, implying that prospective, long-term multicenter cohort studies are required to optimize cranioplasty procedures in children who will undergo cranioplasty following craniectomy.
References
Khader BA, Towler MR. Materials and techniques used in cranioplasty fixation: A review. Vol. 66, Materials Science and Engineering C. Elsevier Ltd; 2016. p. 315–22.
Beederman M, Farina EM, Reid RR. Molecular basis of cranial suture biology and disease: Osteoblastic and osteoclastic perspectives. Vol. 1, Genes and Diseases. Chongqing University; 2014. p. 120–5.
Park EK, Lim JY, Yun IS, Kim JS, Woo SH, Kim DS, et al. Custom-Made Three-Dimensional-Printed Titanium Implants for Skull Defects. J Craniofac Surg. 2016;27(4):943–9.
Williams L, Fan K, Bentley R. Titanium cranioplasty in children and adolescents. Journal of CranioMaxillofacial Surgery. 2016;789–94.
Yang OO, Marucci DD, Gates RJ, Rahman M, Hunt J, Gianoutsos MP, et al. Analysis of the cephalometric changes in the first 3 months after spring-assisted cranioplasty for scaphocephaly. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. 2017;70(5):637–85.
Nakajima Y, Sakamoto Y, Miwa T, Yoshida K, Kishi K. Complications of craniofacial surgery using the ultrasonic-assisted pinned resorbable system: A prospective report with a minimum follow-up of 30 months. Journal of Plastic, Recronstuctive & Aesthetic Surgery. 2020;586–9.
Nguyen PD, Khechoyan DY, Phillips JH, Forrest CR. Custom CAD/CAM implants for complex craniofacial reconstruction in children: Our experience based on 136 cases. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. 2018;71(11):1609–17.
Burge KG, Soto E, Derise N, Rocque BG, Grant 3rd JH, Myers RP. Pediatric Cranioplasty Patients With Hostile Reconstructive Environments: Split Calvarial Versus Prosthetic Implant. Ann Plast Surg . 2023;90:337–41.
Dvoracek LA, Lee JY, Ayyash A, Losee JE, Goldstein JA. Demineralized Bone Matrix and Resorbable Mesh Bilaminate Cranioplasty Is Ineffective for Secondary Reconstruction of Large Pediatric Cranial Defects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;145(1):137–41.
Shah AM, Jung H, Skirboll S. Materials used in cranioplasty: a history and analysis. Neurosurg Focus. 2014;36:19.
Vercler CJ, Sugg KB, Buchman SR. Split cranial bone grafting in children younger than 3 years old: debunking a surgical myth. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133:822–7.
Salam AA, Ibbett I, Thani N. Paediatric cranioplasty: A review. Interdiscip Neurosurg. 2018 Sep 1;13:59–65.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licensing
Ninety Nine Publication publishes articles under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This licensing allows for any use of the work, provided the original author(s) and source are credited, thereby facilitating the free exchange and use of research for the advancement of knowledge.
Detailed Licensing Terms
Attribution (BY): Users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. Users may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses them or their use.
No Additional Restrictions: Users may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
