GASTRECTOMY WITH OMENTUM PRESERVATION VS GASTRECTOMY WITH OMENTECTOMY FOR LOCALLY ADVANCED GASTRIC CANCER: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/km9csg20Keywords:
Gastrectomy, omentum preservation, omentectomy, gastric cancerAbstract
Background: Gastric cancers can be divided into the intestinal type and diffuse type. The most common underlying etiology of intestinal-type carcinoma is Helicobacter pylori infection, which can develop into atrophic gastritis with intestinal metaplasia. Complete omentectomy is considered to be essential in the radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer (GC), but its clinical benefit remains unclear.
The aim: This study aims to show about gastrectomy with omentum preservation vs gastrectomy with omentectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer.
Methods: By comparing itself to the standards set by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and MetaAnalysis (PRISMA) 2020, this study was able to show that it met all of the requirements. So, the experts were able to make sure that the study was as up-to-date as it was possible to be. For this search approach, publications that came out between 2013 and 2023 were taken into account. Several different online reference sources, like Pubmed and SagePub, were used to do this. It was decided not to take into account review pieces, works that had already been published, or works that were only half done.
Result: In the PubMed database, the results of our search brought up 104 articles, whereas the results of our search on SagePub brought up 77 articles. The results of the search conducted for the last year of 2013 yielded a total 88 articles for PubMed and 48 articles for SagePub. The result from title screening, a total 7 articles for PubMed and 28 articles for SagePub. In the end, we compiled a total of 10 papers. We included five research that met the criteria.
Conclusion: Laparoscopic treatment of gastric cancer with D2 lymphadenectomy and omentum preservation is safe and feasible, both for EGC and for AGC. Total omentectomy may be avoided in tumors smaller than 5.25 cm and T1/T2 tumors. However, lymph node metastasis in the greater omentum is associated with recurrence in the peritoneum, liver, ovary and death.
References
Zhu A, Yin G, Liu X, Kong W, Zhang Y, Shan Y, et al. Efficiency of complete omentectomy in patients with resectable gastric cancer: a meta‑analysis and systematic review. BMC Gastroenterol [Internet]. 2021;21(1):1– 11. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01921-3
Chai SW, Wang SH, Wang CY, Chen YC, Soong RS, Huang TS. Partial versus total omentectomy in patients with gastric cancer: A systemic review and meta-analysis. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(19):1–13.
Zizzo M, Zanelli M, Sanguedolce F, Palicelli A, Ascani S, Morini A, et al. Gastrectomy with or without Complete Omentectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer : A Meta-Analysis. 2022;1–16.
Lu S, Yang Z yin, Yan C, Liu W tao, Ni Z tian. A randomized controlled trial to evaluate omentum-preserving gastrectomy for patients with T1 – T3 gastric cancer. 2021;17:3301–7.
Barchi LC, Ramos MFKP, Dias AR, Yagi OK, Ribeiro-Júnior U, Zilberstein B, et al. Total omentectomy in gastric cancer surgery: Is it always necessary? Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2019;32(1):1–7.
Olmi S, Uccelli M, Oldani A, Cesana G, Ciccarese F, Giorgi R, et al. Laparoscopic Surgery of Gastric Cancer with D2 Lymphadenectomy and Omentum Preservation : Our 10 Years Experience. 2020;00(00):1–10.
Lan YT, Huang KH, Chen PH, Liu CA, Lo SS, Wu CW, et al. A pilot study of lymph node mapping with indocyanine green in robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. SAGE Open Med. 2017;5(201).
Back J, Sallinen V, Kokkola A, Puolakkainen P. Surgical and oncological outcomes of D1 versus D2 gastrectomy among elderly patients treated for gastric cancer. Scand J Surg. 2022;111(2).
Patrick T, Birgin E, Mertens C, Schwarzbach M, Post S, Rahbari NN, et al. Clinical Pathways for Oncological Gastrectomy : Are They a Suitable Instrument for Process Standardization to Improve Process and Outcome Quality for Patients Undergoing Gastrectomy ? A Retrospective Cohort Study. :1–13.
Surgery G. Wj g s. 2021;13(5):461–76.
Sakimura Y, Inaki N, Tsuji T, Kadoya S, Bando H. Long ‑ term outcomes of omentum ‑ preserving versus resecting gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer with propensity score analysis. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2020;1–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73367-8
Li Z, Song M, Zhou Y, Jiang H, Xu L, Hu Z, et al. Efficacy of Omentum-Preserving Gastrectomy for Patients With Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol. 2021;11(September):1–9.
Kim T han, Lee Y joon, Bae K, Park J ho, Hong S chan, Jung E jung, et al. The investigation of diet recovery after distal gastrectomy.
Sato Y, Yamada T, Yoshikawa T, Machida R, Mizusawa J, Katayama H, et al. Randomized controlled Phase III trial to evaluate omentum preserving gastrectomy for patients with advanced gastric cancer ( JCOG1711 , ROAD-GC ). 2020;50(July):1321–4.
Marano L, Ignazio AD, Resca L, Marrelli D, Roviello F. Robotic ‑ assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer : single Western center results. Updates Surg [Internet]. 2021;73(3):865–72. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00896-2
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licensing
Ninety Nine Publication publishes articles under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This licensing allows for any use of the work, provided the original author(s) and source are credited, thereby facilitating the free exchange and use of research for the advancement of knowledge.
Detailed Licensing Terms
Attribution (BY): Users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. Users may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses them or their use.
No Additional Restrictions: Users may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
