COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVE PERIPHERAL AND TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Muhammad Sabri; Faisal Syahroni Nasution; Aulia Doli Namora Siregar; Reza Tri Sutrisno; Zainal Arifin Rambe; Annisa Tria Fadilla

doi:10.53555/387rv854

Authors

Muhammad Sabri Faculty of Medicine, Islamic University of North Sumatra, Indonesia Author
Faisal Syahroni Nasution Faculty of Medicine, Islamic University of North Sumatra, Indonesia Author
Aulia Doli Namora Siregar Robert Wolter Mongisidi National Army Hospital, Manado, Indonesia Author
Reza Tri Sutrisno dr. Adhyatma, MPH General Hospital, Central Java, Indonesia Author
Zainal Arifin Rambe Faculty of Medicine, Islamic University of North Sumatra, Indonesia Author
Annisa Tria Fadilla Faculty of Medicine, Islamic University of North Sumatra, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53555/387rv854

Keywords:

Transcatheter aortic, valve replacement, alternative peripheral

Abstract

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is approved for use in low-to-extreme-risk patients with aortic stenosis, with volumes exceeding those of surgical aortic valve replacement and outcomes continuing to improve. The transfemoral (TF) access route is accepted as the first choice for TAVR and accounts for 95% of cases. However, the use of alternative access remains relevant in many patients with peripheral vascular disease or unfavorable anatomy.

The aim: This study aims to show about comparison of alternative peripheral and transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Methods: By comparing itself to the standards set by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and MetaAnalysis (PRISMA) 2020, this study was able to show that it met all of the requirements. So, the experts were able to make sure that the study was as up-to-date as it was possible to be. For this search approach, publications that came out between 2013 and 2023 were taken into account. Several different online reference sources, like Pubmed and SagePub, were used to do this. It was decided not to take into account review pieces, works that had already been published, or works that were only half done.

Result: In the PubMed database, the results of our search brought up 135 articles, whereas the results of our search on SagePub brought up 118 articles. The results of the search conducted for the last year of 2013 yielded a total 56 articles for PubMed and 33 articles for SagePub. The result from title screening, a total 16 articles for PubMed and 10 articles for SagePub. In the end, we compiled a total of 8 papers. We included five research that met the criteria.

Conclusion: To compare outcomes among transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) performed via transaortic (TAo) and subclavian (SCL) approaches. Many patients are not amenable for TAVR via the transfemoral route due to peripheral vascular disease. Limited data exist regarding safety and procedural feasibility of TAVR via TAo and SCL routes.

References

McCarthy FH, Spragan DD, Savino D, Dibble T, Hoedt AC, McDermott KM, et al. Outcomes, readmissions, and costs in transfemoral and alterative access transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the US Medicare population. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg [Internet] 2017;154(4):1224-1232.e1. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.04.090

Khan AA, Kovacic JC, Engstrom K, Stewart A, Anyanwu A, Basnet S, et al. Comparison of Transaortic and Subclavian Approaches for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with No Transfemoral Access Options. Struct Hear. 2018;2(5):463–8.

Beurtheret S, Karam N, Resseguier N, Houel R, Modine T, Folliguet T, et al. Femoral Versus Nonfemoral Peripheral Access for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74(22):2728–39.

Perry TE, George SA, Lee B, Wahr J, Randle D, Sigurðsson G. A guide for pre-procedural imaging for transcatheter aortic valve replacement patients. Perioper Med. 2020;9(1):1–11.

Němec P, Ondrášek J, Malík P, Třetina M, Pokorný P, Poloczek M, et al. Comparison of the surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients. Cor Vasa [Internet] 2012;54(2):e76–83. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvasa.2012.02.003

Isogai T, Agrawal A, Shekhar S, Spilias N, Puri R, Krishnaswamy A, et al. Comparison of Outcomes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Requiring Peripheral Vascular Intervention or Alternative Access. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023;12(12).

Pineda AM, Rymer J, Wang A, Koweek LH, Williams A, Kiefer T, et al. Trends and Outcomes of AlternativeAccess Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. J Invasive Cardiol [Internet] 2019 Jul;31(7):E184–91. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31257212

Choi CH, Cheng V, Malaver D, Kon N, Kincaid EH, Gandhi SK, et al. A comparison of valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement in failed stentless versus stented surgical bioprosthetic aortic valves. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;93(6):1106–15.

Hoover NE, Ouranos HB, Memon S, Azemi T, Piccirillo BJ, Sadiq IR, et al. Transcarotid Versus Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (from a Propensity-Matched Comparison). Am J Cardiol [Internet] 2022;185:71–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.09.003

Mach M, Poschner T, Hasan W, Kerbel T, Szalkiewicz P, Hasimbegovic E, et al. Transcatheter versus isolated surgical aortic valve replacement in young high-risk patients: A propensity score-matched analysis. J Clin Med. 2021;10(15).

Wong CK, Chiu ACHO, Chan KYE, Sze SY, Tam FCC, Un KC, et al. Advances in technology and techniques for transcatheter aortic valve replacement with concomitant peripheral arterial disease. Front Med Technol. 2022;4(2).

Bansal A, Kalra A, Kumar A, Campbell J, Krishnaswamy A, Kapadia SR, et al. Outcomes of Combined Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Peripheral Vascular Intervention in the United States. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14(23):2572–80.

Raptis DA, Beal MA, Kraft DC, Maniar HS, Bierhals AJ. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Alternative access beyond the femoral arterial approach. Radiographics. 2019;39(1):30–43.

Herremans A, Stevesyns DT, El Jattari H, Rosseel M, Rosseel L. The Place of Transaxillary Access in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) Compared to Alternative Routes—A Systematic Review Article. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023;24(5).

Buzzatti N, Sala A, Alfieri O. Comparing traditional aortic valve surgery and transapical approach to transcatheter aortic valve implant. Eur Hear Journal, Suppl. 2020;22:E7–12.