ONE- STEP COMPARED WITH TWO-STEP GESTATIONAL DIABETES SCREENING AND PREGNANCY OUTCOMES A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53555/nnmhs.v9i8.1788Keywords:
Gestational diabetes, two-step approach, systematic review, pregnancy outcomesAbstract
Background: Carbohydrate disorders, including gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and pregestational diabetes, have significant impacts on maternal, fetal, and neonatal health.
Aim: This study aims to conduct a systematic review and analyze pooled data to evaluate how the choice of GDM testing strategy influences pregnancy outcomes.
Methods: This systematic review adhered to the PRISMA guidelines. The study question and eligibility criteria were defined using the PICOT method, focusing on pregnant patients and comparing IADPSG one-step to Carpenter-Coustan two-step testing in the late mid-trimester
Results: Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included, involving a total of 2,333 participants. The one-step approach demonstrated a non-significant difference in GDM incidence compared to the two-step approach. However, the one-step approach was associated with significantly improved maternal and perinatal outcomes
Conclusion: This systematic review provides insights into the comparison of One Step versus Two Step approaches for gestational diabetes screening and their impact on maternal and perinatal outcomes. While the incidence of GDM did not significantly differ between the two approaches
References
Yuen L, Saeedi P, Riaz M, Karuranga S, Divakar H, Levitt N, et al. Projections of the prevalence of hyperglycaemia in pregnancy in 2019 and beyond: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9th edition. Diabetes Res Clin Pract [Internet] 2019;157:107841. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2019.107841
Study H. Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) study: preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202(3):255.e1-255.e7.
Hosseini E, Janghorbani M. Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnosing gestational diabetes mellitus with one-step or two-step approaches and associations with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2018;143(2):137–44.
Yeral MI, Ozgu-Erdinc AS, Uygur D, Seckin KD, Karsli MF, Danisman AN. Prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus in the first trimester, comparison of fasting plasma glucose, two-step and one-step methods: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Endocrine. 2014;46(3):512–8.
Meltzer SJ, Snyder J, Penrod JR, Nudi M, Morin L. Gestational diabetes mellitus screening and diagnosis: A prospective randomised controlled trial comparing costs of one-step and two-step methods. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;117(4):407–15.
Sevket O, Ates S, Uysal O, Molla T, Dansuk R, Kelekci S. To evaluate the prevalence and clinical outcomes using a one-step method versus a two-step method to screen gestational diabetes mellitus. J Matern Neonatal Med. 2014;27(1):36–41.
Scifres CM, Abebe KZ, Jones KA, Comer DM, Costacou T, Freiberg MS, et al. Gestational Diabetes Diagnostic Methods (GD2M) Pilot Randomized Trial. Matern Child Health J. 2015;19(7):1472–80.
Hillier TA, Pedula KL, Ogasawara KK, Vesco KK, Oshiro CES, Lubarsky SL, et al. Further implications from a pragmatic randomized clinical trial of gestational diabetes screening: per-protocol and as-treated estimates. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;225(5):581–3.
ACOG Practice Bulletins. Gestational diabetes mellitus. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 190. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131(180):e49–64.
Khalifeh A, Eckler R, Felder L, Saccone G, Caissutti C, Berghella V. One-step versus two-step diagnostic testing for gestational diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. J Matern Neonatal Med. 2020;33(4):612–7.
Farrar D, Duley L, Dowswell T, Lawlor DA. Different strategies for diagnosing gestational diabetes to improve maternal and infant health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;2017(8).
Espinoza J, Vidaeff A, Pettker christian m, Simhan H. Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia - Clinical Management Guidelines for Obstetrician – Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(76):168–86.
Lucovnik M, Steblovnik L, Verdenik I, Premru-Srsen T, Tomazic M, Tul N. Changes in perinatal outcomes after implementation of IADPSG criteria for screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: A national survey. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2020;149(1):88–92.
Lee KW, Ching SM, Ramachandran V, Yee A, Hoo FK, Chia YC, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of gestational diabetes mellitus in Asia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):1–20.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
